Wednesday, November 17, 2004

ABC News: The 9-11 Lottery Coincidence


ABC News: The 9-11 Lottery Coincidence: "Oct. 6  Everything's connected: the attacks on America last year, the New York State lottery, the collapse of WorldCom, the Bush Administration's proposed war against Iraq, the death of quarterback Johnny Unitas, and many other private events. To top this off, Arthur C. Clarke anticipated some of these incidents decades ago.

Let me back up a bit. On Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2002 — 9/11/02 — the New York State lottery numbers were 911, an eerie coincidence that set many people to thinking or, perhaps more accurately, to not thinking.

A natural question comes to mind: How likely is this? After all, the lottery took place in New York state on the anniversary of the mass murder exactly one year before.

These factors are not relevant, however. On any given day, each of the 1,000 possiblities — 000, 001, … 233, …, 714, …, 998, 999 — is as likely to come up as any other. This is true of Sept. 11 as well, so the probability that 911 would come up on that date is simply 1 in a 1,000. This probability is small, but not minuscule."

At least 5 "Training Exercises" in progress on the morning of 911

At least 5 "Training Exercises" in progress on the morning of September 11th

As Mike Ruppert will delinate in his upcoming book "Crossing the Rubicon" there were at least five "Training Exercises" in progress on the morning of 9/11 2001. Each and every one, and any others we may not yet know of, was under the control of our vice president Dick Cheney.

1 ) MILITARY EXERCISE NORTHERN VIGILANCE: Transferred most of the combat ready interceptors and possibly many AWACS from the north east into northen Canada and Alaska. This explains,in part, why there were only eight ( 8 ) combat interceptors in the NE on 9/11.

2 ) NON-MILITARY BIOWARFARE EXERCISE TRIPOD II: FEMA arrived in NYC on 10 Sept 2001 to set up the command post for FEMA, NEW YORK CITY AND DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE on Manhattan's PIER 29. This shows our masters are loving, they made a strong effort to minimize the required deaths. This was probably forced on them by the CFR, nice guys who must occasionally kill innocent people.

3 ) WARGAME EXERCISE, VIGILANT GUARDIAN: This exercise simulated hi-jacked planes in the northeast sector. The 9/11 commission made only mention of this single exercise and lied about its purpose. The commisssion said its purpose was to intercept Russian bombers.

4 ) WARGAME EXERCISE, VIGILANT WARRIOR: This exercise simulated hi-jacked planes in the northeast sector.

5 ) WARGAME EXERCISE NORTHERN GUARDIAN: This exercise simulated hi-jacked planes in the northeast sector.

At the time of the real hi-jacking there were as many as 22 hi-jacked aircraft on NORAD's radar screen.

Some of these drills were "Live Fly" exercises were actual aircraft, likely flown by remote control were simulating hi-jacked aircraft. Some of the drills electronically added the hi-jacked aircraft into the system. All this as the real hi-jackings began.

NORAD could not tell the difference between the seventeen bogus blips and the five actual hi-jacked aircraft blips. Cheney could.

It is clear we know almost nothing about how 9/11 was executed. We should know it was an exceeding highly technological operation involving dozens of major projects each employing large resources.

Source

I've been talking about this for years, literally. And there's more. He missed one.

9-11: On September 11th, CIA Was Running Simulation of a Plane Crashing into a Building
valis on Sep 04, 2004 - 04:56 PM

(AP)-WASHINGTON -- In what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft crashed into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't terrorism -- it was to be a simulated accident.

Officials at the Chantilly, Va.-based National Reconnaissance Office had scheduled an exercise that morning in which a small corporate jet crashed into one of the four towers at the agency's headquarters building after experiencing a mechanical failure.

The agency is about four miles from the runways of Washington Dulles International Airport.

Agency chiefs came up with the scenario to test employees' ability to respond to a disaster, said spokesman Art Haubold. To simulate the damage from the plane, some stairwells and exits were to be closed off, forcing employees to find other ways to evacuate the building.

"It was just an incredible coincidence that this happened to involve an aircraft crashing into our facility," Haubold said. "As soon as the real world events began, we canceled the exercise."

Terrorism was to play no role in the exercise, which had been planned for several months, he said.

Adding to the coincidence, American Airlines Flight 77 -- the Boeing 767 that was hijacked and crashed into the Pentagon -- took off from Dulles at 8:10 a.m. on Sept. 11, 50 minutes before the exercise was to begin. It struck the Pentagon around 9:40 a.m., killing 64 aboard the plane and 125 on the ground.

The National Reconnaissance Office operates many of the nation's spy satellites. It draws its personnel from the military and the CIA.

After the Sept. 11 attacks, most of the 3,000 people who work at agency headquarters were sent home, save for some essential personnel, Haubold said.

An announcement for an upcoming homeland security conference in Chicago first noted the exercise.

In a promotion for speaker John Fulton, a CIA officer assigned as chief of NRO's strategic gaming division, the announcement says, "On the morning of September 11th 2001, Mr. Fulton and his team ... were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were to strike a building. Little did they know that the scenario would come true in a dramatic way that day."

The conference is being run by the National Law Enforcement and Security Institute.

TheMemoryHole.org

Too bad that wasn't the only drill happening that morning, there were 2 more

The U.S. Government, Not the Hijackers, 'Chose' the Date of the 9-11 Attacks
by Barbara Honegger

From the start, the Bush Administration has insisted that anything like the 'planes-as-weapons' scenario of 9-11 was 'unthinkable' before 9-11. That's a Huge Lie. On Sept. 11, 2001 they had a brand new counter-terror emergency response plan in place at the Pentagon for exactly that scenario, and had a counter-terror 'war-game' set to begin on exactly that scenario that very morning in the nation's capitol.

This brief sets forth the growing reasons to believe that the date for the attack was not 'chosen' by the hijackers at all, but that one of them learned that a counter-terror war-game/exercise simulating a scenario like the one that actually took place on 9-11 was planned for that morning, and then 'piggybacked' the "real thing" on top of it. Here are some of the critical 'burning data points':

1) Military aircraft had more than enough time - nearly three quarters of an hour -- to respond to and intercept the 9-11 Pentagon plane after all key decision makers were 100% certain the Twin Tower hits had been terrorist attacks and that Flight 77 had also been hijacked, but didn't do so 'in time'. This is beyond comprehension over the nation's capital unless some previous piece of information or mental set led them to assume the Pentagon plane could not be a terrorist vehicle, or at least confuse them as to whether it was or not. If those looking on from inside the Pentagon as 9-11 unfolded believed flight 77 was, or might be, part of a "Red Team" counter- terror exercise set for that very morning, it would explain the otherwise incomprehensible delay, almost to the point of paralysis, in effectively scrambling interceptors.

2) For the above to be the case, an actual counter-terrorist simulation/war-game/exercise had to have been planned for that very morning, 9-11. More specifically, it would have had to have been a counter-terrorist war-game involving the same or a very similar scenario as what actually began to take place - i.e. a plane or planes crashing into a building or buildings in the Washington, D.C. area.

3) The above, in fact, did happen. On Aug. 22, 2002 Associated Press ran the following story (version carried in AirDisaster.com): "Top U.S. Intelligence Agency was to simulate plane crash into government building on September 11, 2001. U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings. Full story at:
AirDisaster.com

4) After reading the above article about NRO's planned 9-11 exercise or a scenario similar to what actually happened that morning, I was certain that the 'revelation' was a 'partial hangout' - i.e. that other federal agencies in the D.C. area, both military and civilian, also had 'war-games' on the plane-into-building scenario scheduled for the morning of 9-11.

5) A search of the Washington Post and New York Times for the week after 9-11 revealed the following amazing facts which require the context provided by 3) and 4) above to be meaningful:

The Washington Post reported on 9/16/01 that the original pilot of Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon, former F-4 fighter pilot Charles Burlingame had, in his last Navy job developing anti-terror strategies for the Navy before retiring to fly for American Airlines, drafted the Pentagon's emergency response plan in case it was hit by a civilian airliner. Also, on the morning of 9-11, Pentagon medic Matt Rosenberg was in the health clinic on Corridor 8, "Grateful for an uninterrupted hour in which he could study a new medical emergency disaster plan based on the unlikely scenario of an airplane crashing into the Pentagon." Clearly, the disaster plan Rosenberg was reading just before Burlingame's plane hit the Navy Command Center was part of the very plan Burlingame himself had put together.

Precisely what the above means in the context of the counter- terror 'war-game' planned for that very morning with the full knowledge of key personnel in the military and CIA (NRO, the one agency which, so far, has acknowledged having a plane-into-building simulation on 9-11 is staffed by military and CIA personnel) is not yet clear, but one thing is certain. It is absolutely and completely beyond coincidence.

6) With this new context, we can now see why the leak of the exact wording (not the fact of, which had already been reported in the Washington Times two weeks after 9-11) of a Sept. 10, 2001 NSA intercept so worried and infuriated Vice President Cheney that he demanded an FBI investigation of members of the House and Senate Intelligence Committee Joint 9-11 investigation to determine who might have leaked it. That key intercept between the leader of the 9-11 hijackers, Mohammad Atta, and the 'mastermind' of the 9-11 plot, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, said: "The Match is about to begin. Tomorrow (i.e. 9-11) is zero hour." "Match", of course, is what you would expect if the speaker were referring to his discovery of the date that the U.S. Government had selected to conduct its counter-terror simulation/exercise on the scenario of plane(s) crashing into government buildings - one that was about to turn very real when the terrorists 'piggybacked' their long-planned plot onto it. On 9-10-02, Knight-Ridder reported that U.S. intelligence officials now believe that in that critical "Match" call, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed gave Atta coded approval for the four teams of hijackers to proceed. On the contrary, given the new context in which this all finally begins to make sense, Atta was merely communicating to his boss, or vise versa, the date that the U.S. government exercise was to take place. Bin al Shibh, Atta, and Mohammad didn't 'choose the date'. The U.S. Government did.

This also explains the choice of date for the attack, which was the date chosen for the 'emergency' preparedness exercise. 9-11 is U.S. abbreviation for 'emergency', and that's precisely the kind of code name the military and intelligence communities like to give their 'exercises.’ Islamic radicals, rather, choose significant anniversary dates for their attacks - such as August 7 for the twin bombings of the U.S. embassies in Africa. To bin Laden and his followers, August 7 is their "Pearl Harbor" anniversary - the day U.S. troops, then under orders from first President Bush's Secretary of Defense Cheney, landed in Saudi Arabia following Saddam Hussein's August 2, 1990 invasion of Kuwait. I've checked ten years of back papers: Sept. 11 is not among the 'anniversary' dates for radical Islamicists. They didn't choose it. (President Bush is also keenly aware of August 7 as the key 'anniversary' date in bin Laden's mind -- that's why he requested the one brief he was given before 9-11 on possible terror attacks on the U.S. mainland, held at his Texas ranch, the day before -- Aug. 6, 2001).

7) We also know why it was Vice President Cheney who was so upset that the content of the "Match" call was made public. Now, someone might figure out that it was he - having been charged by President Bush on May 8, 2001 (Time magazine) to lead a high-level task force to identify the U.S.'s vulnerabilities to domestic terrorist attack and figure out ways to fix them -- who was 'in charge' of the 'plane(s)- into-building(s)' counter-terror 'exercise' the morning of Sept. 11. That's why he was in the White House Sit Room; and why President Bush kept reading to grammar school kids in Florida long after he should have instantly broken it off to perform his emergency duties as Commander-in-Chief. The reason was that Bush 'knew' - or thought he knew - that it was 'just a game.'

8) Finally, for all of this to 'work', the bad guys had to have at least one person among them who had fooled U.S. intelligence into believing that he was 'one of us.' That person, almost certainly, is Khalid Shaikh Muhammed -- the only person about whom all information is still classified, even his name, even though reams have already been written about him in the open press. He is also the only living 9-11 operative still at large. And for good reason. Vice President Cheney, President Bush, CIA Director Tenet, CIA officer and chief of NRO's strategic gaming division for their 9-11 'plane-into-building' exercise, John Fulton, and all the others who were so stupid as to risk thousands of innocent American lives on the bet that their star 'informant,’ Khalid Sheikh Muhammed had really been 'turned' -- don't want him to talk about what he knows. And he knows a lot. On Sept. 10, 2002, Knight-Ridder quoted a top U.N. counter-terror expert that Mohammad is probably also the only person who has all the pieces to the 9-11 puzzle. Not surprisingly, CIA Director Tenet has also classified all information about what President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Condolezza Rice, and everyone else at the White House were told about Khalid Sheikh Muhammed.

9) It's time for the Joint House/Senate Intelligence Committee 9-11 investigation, and the future independent 9-11 investigation, to insist on any time, any where, on demand surprise searches of all Bush Administration files on 9-11. This, after all, is the Administration that insisted that anything like the 'planes as weapons' scenario of 9-11 was 'unthinkable' before 9-11. Right. They had a brand new counter-terror emergency plan in place at the Pentagon for exactly that scenario, and had a counter-terror 'war-game' set to begin on exactly that scenario that very morning. Just couldn't imagine. Because putting together counter-terror exercises like the one that was to take place the morning of 9-11 in the nation's capitol was precisely the right thing to do, the fact that everyone in the Administration from the President on down has so completely lied about it shows that they have something terrible, indeed, to hide. In this brief, we've begun to discern its shape.

P.S. Prof. John Arquilla, an information warfare and Special Operations expert at the Naval Postgraduate School, told The Monterey Herald (7/18/02): "The idea of such an attack (like 9-11) was well known. It had been war-gamed as a possibility in exercises before Sept. 11, 2001."

APFN.net

According to a cached version (link dead) of Aviation Week's Aviation Week & Space Technology, there was yet another drill going on that dark morning:

"Part of the exercise?" the colonel wondered. No; this is a real-world event, he was told. Several days into a semiannual exercise known as Vigilant Guardian, NEADS was fully staffed, its key officers and enlisted supervisors already manning the operations center "battle cab."

This was an annual drill that "involves all HQ NORAD levels of command and is designed to exercise most aspects of the NORAD mission".

GlobalSecurity.org

MDW.Army.Mil - Contingency Planning Photos

NYC Resident Mark Allen's Precognitive Dream - September 7th 2001

9/7/01: Whoa!!! A Freudian bonanza last night!!!

    At the beginning of the dream I am inside a giant birth canal that is actually the set of a FOX made for TV movie. Sometimes the made for TV movie appears to be some foreign film that I rented and am showing to friends. Yet somehow, sometimes what is happening on the "set" of the giant birth canal is actually real and I am actually experiencing it. Sometimes I am a character in the film, sometimes I am an observer "watching" the film on a TV screen in a dark room with friends, and sometimes I am just myself and am participating in what is happening in the film and the film is reality and there actually is no "film". Got all that? Hey, it's dream logic.
    Here's what's happening in the giant birth canal:
    I am part of some rogue team of renegades or terrorists that exist in the future. We inhabit this giant vagina for a purpose, a mission. The walls of the canal look just like you would thing, all red and curvy and like giant slabs of vagina muscle walls. Not slimey though. We all wear these black SWAT-like uniforms with laser guns and special goggles and everything. We have all kinds of computer surveillance equipment inside the vagina, very high tech. Sometimes the walls of the canal turn into just regular dark walls with windows, and then back again. Our "mission" seems to involve these itty bitty tiny little oval shaped pellets of ice. They look like tiny transparent pearls. When you get up close to the tiny little oval pellets of ice you see a dot of orange and black in the center of each one. This is a tiny almost embryonic goldfish. The orange part is it's developing body, the black part it's eye and it little tail is near transparent. The near microscopic body of the almost developed goldfish sits frozen in the center of this tiny little round (oval) ice thing.
    There are millions and billions of these little frozen round ice things with tiny goldfish in them that we have to deal with or "control" or "help" somehow. These little things live somewhere in the walls of the giant vagina and at some certain time they all come rushing out of various parts of the walls and all rush like mad in one direction to an opening at one end that appears to be the way "out" of the vagina. They get dumped "out" of the vagina this way (why are the sperm going 'out' of what appears to be the entrance of the vagina? Or is that the passageway 'in' to where the eggs are?) Our "mission" is to help them along and make sure nothing goes wrong, when this occurs.
    This happens twice during my dream. All the frozen pellets with fish in the rush out of the walls and zoom in a frenzy toward one end (the end they go to gets all small like it would be hard to fit through and there is a kind of traffic jam as they all try and fit through). We have a webcam pointed at the end of the vagina where they are trying to escape. We can watch the progress on a video monitor from another end of the vagina. It looks really pretty, zillions of the frozen little fish spheres all rushing and vibrating like crazy in a river of determination, against a red orange background. It looks like an old 4AD album cover design. Sometimes the webcam does a close up and you can really see the little fish and the look of hope in their eyes.
    The leader of our group looks like Christopher Walken. There is also someone on our team that looks like that actress from that FOX TV show "Dark Angel", Max Guevara (at one point she is in training and is at a computer console with a hand held video game type handle and is trying to do something important and is having a hard time and Christopher Walken is yelling at her and the 'camera' of the film kind of moves in on her chapped lips - which I know are make up since this is a movie - and it's all very dramatic). I think the comedian Kathy Griffin is also on our team. Every time the fish come out it is a mad rush for us to make sure it's all going well and then as the fish are kind of on their way and all crowding around the exit to the vagina, we all sit around the video monitor and watch or listen to Christopher Walken tell old stories about his old days in the giant vagina frozen fish days (he seems to be an old veteran at it). He always interrupts his own stories for a second and says "You know, you can go observe the frozen fish crowding down at the other end of the vagina or you can observe it on this video monitor hook up thing we have...that's new. It was my idea!" He always says this very self-satisfied. We are all quiet while he tells his stories.
    Then I seem to be in another reality, another NYC that looks nothing like NYC. It is sunny and daytime. There is one point where I am trying to do something secret under this grassy highway underpass - I am trying to make these drawings on paper or something and there is a sidewalk near me and this line of school children who all have really strange hairstyles are walking along it. I don't want them to see me for some reason.
    Then I'm walking down the street and suddenly I hear people screaming and saying stuff like "It's a really big accident" and "Oh my God!!!" and I run to the intersection and look down the street (the next intersection seems to drop off into the Hudson River - so I must be somewhere on the upper east side) and I see this gigantic concrete "cone" thing that has tiered steps like a pyramid - but it's a cone. It is spinning slowly and as it does I see a bunch of people getting kind of "dumped" onto it from above somewhere. Some of the people are dead already and others are screaming and trying to get off the cone and getting crushed. It's really a major deal and really horrific. My adrenaline rushes and I grab my cell phone and dial 911. As I am I am thinking "A lot of people are probably calling 911 from their cells but I'm going to call anyway - I wonder if 911 waits to hear a certain amount of calls on major disasters before they know if it's a hoax or not - because really that is the first they would hear about it and if it was just one call it might be a prank." I am stuttering and choking on tears as I talk to the 911 operator because it's such an intense scary moment.
    After I hang up the phone after giving the operator the information I look up and see the disaster is just getting worse. Whole 18 wheeler trucks and cars with people in them are getting dumped onto the cone and everyone is getting crushed and people are screaming and it's awful.

Dreams and More at MarkAllenCam dot com
Dreams September 2001

Operation Holy Tuesday Known by CIA Since Year 2000

CIA had Malaysia secret police monitor Jan., 2000 al Qaeda meeting where "Operation Holy Tuesday" (9/11) was planned

As highlighted by valis, founder of libertythink.com, on his new website Awoken, according to a July 10, 2003 New York Post article (free archive.org cache) (emphasis added):

The Sept. 11 attacks were given the code name "Operation Holy Tuesday" and precisely planned at an al Qaeda meeting in Malaysia chaired by terror mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in January 2000, it was revealed yesterday.

The purpose of the three-day secret terror conference, which was monitored by the Malaysian secret police at the CIA's request, was to discuss details of how the hijackers should train and hide in the United States and how the attacks should be carried out.

"This was the first planning meeting of the 9/11 operation. It was to review the progress they had achieved on the operation and to map out their future course of action," Rohan Gunaratna, the world's most renowned expert on Osama bin Laden, told reporters after he appeared before the commission probing 9/11.

The meeting of terrorists in Malaysia has previously been disclosed, but Gunaratna added new details that have never before been revealed, such as the involvement of Khalid Mohammed. Also, the name of the attacks, "Operation Holy Tuesday," has not been previously known.

Gunaratna, based in Singapore, is a counter-terrorism consultant for the U.S. and British governments who says he has had access to records of interrogations of captured al Qaeda leaders.

Mohammed was in charge of the Malaysia meeting and told some of the other terrorists there the targets would include the World Trade Center and the date of the attacks would be Sept. 11, 2001, Gunaratna said.

This was also covered in an Ananova story from about the same time.
As for the veracity of the quoted Rohan Gunaratna, according to an Oct. 10, 2003 U.S. State Dept. transcript:

Interview by The Australian
Richard L. Armitage, Deputy Secretary of State

[...] QUESTION: In terms of the threat, I was reading some comments by a fellow called Rohan Gunaratna, I think his name is --

DEPUTY SECRETARY ARMITAGE: Yes, he's a very expert observer of the radical Islamic scene.

UnderReported.com

MackWhite.com on the Official Operation Northwoods Documents


Friend and fellow ParaPolitical Journalist and Conspiratorial Comic Artist, Mack White, produced a wonderful comic strip on Operation Northwoods a couple years ago.

Now he has produced even more comic art for his BUSH JUNTA collection.
MackWhite.com: Operation Northwoods

Original Official NSA Declassified Documents:
The National Security Archive April 30, 2001

In his new exposé of the National Security Agency entitled Body of Secrets, author James Bamford highlights a set of proposals on Cuba by the Joint Chiefs of Staff codenamed OPERATION NORTHWOODS. This document, titled "Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba" was provided by the JCS to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on March 13, 1962, as the key component of Northwoods. Written in response to a request from the Chief of the Cuba Project, Col. Edward Lansdale, the Top Secret memorandum describes U.S. plans to covertly engineer various pretexts that would justify a U.S. invasion of Cuba. These proposals - part of a secret anti-Castro program known as Operation Mongoose - included staging the assassinations of Cubans living in the United States, developing a fake "Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington," including "sink[ing] a boatload of Cuban refugees (real or simulated)," faking a Cuban airforce attack on a civilian jetliner, and concocting a "Remember the Maine" incident by blowing up a U.S. ship in Cuban waters and then blaming the incident on Cuban sabotage. Bamford himself writes that Operation Northwoods "may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government." Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba [includes cover memoranda], March 13, 1962, TOP SECRET, 15 pp.

NSA Archives Online
PDF of Docs

Tuesday, November 16, 2004

Jeffery Lewis' Precognitive Dream - September 9th

Pre 911 Dream - The Sleep of Towers

The Basement of Catastrophe

On September 9, 2001, I have the following dream: I am in the basement of The Towers dorm in Madison, WI., on State Street. I was a student in Madison many years ago but have never been in the basement of The Towers. In fact, I do not know if the place still is a dorm (from "dormir" Latin for "sleep") for university students or if it even exists any longer. It does in this dream. There is a bar in the basement and some sort of event is being planned or prepared here. I have what I would describe as a "guide" here, someone familiar with the group, maybe a fraternity, putting on the party which is to happen some time later. My inclination is to say my guide here is like Robin William's son played by Cuba Gooding, his guide in the "afterlife" in the film What Dreams May Come. We tour around the bar, but do not drink. From one end of it we see what I can only describe as a horrific series of "special effects," special effects from films I mean. I watch down behind the bar as it becomes a city street. There is some kind of explosion or earthquake and buildings begin to topple. As they do there are explosions, fireballs, and other effects we have seen in a hundred different Hollywood films from Air Force One, to True Lies in which a plane flies through a building. But in particular there is the billowing cloud of fire and smoke effect from Independence Day after the "aliens" blast the Empire State Building. I recall as I watch the horrified "oh, shit!" of one characters from the film as the billowing cloud of death approaches him. In fact, so "real" are these special effects down in the basement of this dorm or tower of sleep that they cause me to turn away to flee as the cloud bears down the bar at me. As I prepare to flee I wake up to lie panting in bed wondering what exactly is it I have seen?

Read the Rest here


Post 911 Dream - The New Victorians

Back to Badger House--September 13, 2001

On this night, two days after the New York Trade Center attack I have the following dream which contains a very peculiar . . . ambience, feeling . . . smell:

I return with my daughter from The Towers, the big dorm in Madison, Wisconsin which figured in a premonitory dream about the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York which I just wrote about in a piece called, "The Sleep of the Towers," to Badger House, the three story rooming house I lived in when a student at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, in the 1960s.

Mariah, my daughter, and I climb the stairs into the building up to the second floor where my room was located. I have been away for some time, at least overnight, but just how long is not clear in the dream. As we reach the top of the stairs I see a key with a tag tied to it outside the door of a room I take to be my own. There is a note with the key from the landlord explaining to the tenant of the room that he, the landlord, found the room unlocked during the evening and locked it for the tenant so that it would not remain open all night when the tenant was away. The note also explains there is a $15.00 fee for this service.

I then see another door down the hall with the same key and the same note. What is this I wonder, a deja vu, like in The Matrix, meaning The Matrix has changed something in the dream? No, I decide, this is actually the door to my room though it is not in the same place, rather over in the corner of the room . . . as if opening on the Blair Witch basement where if one looks into the room, instead of into the corner, one would see the identity of the murderer. So, something has been changed. The hallway is not the same, my room is not the same and the door is in a different place. Yes, obviously, The Matrix, the computer program in operation in dreaming? has changed things. But why?

And these superficial changes are not the only ones, the whole house has been remodeled. I don't notice this until upstairs in the hall. But the hall has a . . . Victorian feeling. There are ornate decorative wood work, heavy maroon rugs, dark drapes, elaborate lighting fixtures and . . . something else! What is it?

Neo was here, that's what it is! I can feel Neo, the Keanu Reeves character, hero of The Matrix, here in the hall somehow with us. Just how is not clear but I can sense him, feel him, like a presence, a smell, a kind of emanation in the house as if he was in the wall almost. I can see him, too, in my mind. He too, is in Victorian garb, a maroon smoking jacket with big lapels, some kind of soft, satiny pants, maybe slippers, like someone out of a Sherlock Holmes mystery.

Read the Rest here

Excerpt From BODY OF SECRETS by James Bamford, Doubleday, 2001, p.82 and following detailing Operation Northwoods

...In [Joint Chief's chair] Lemnitzer's view, the country would be far better off if the generals could take over. [JFK assassination legend has it some general presided over the fudgy JFK autopsy. --Mk]

For those military officers who were sitting on the fence, the Kennedy administration's botched Bay of Pigs invasion was the last straw. "The Bay of Pigs fiasco broke the dike," said one report at the time. "President Kennedy was pilloried by the super patriots as a 'no-win' chief . . . The Far Right became a fount of proposals born of frustration and put forward in the name of anti-Communism. . . Active-duty commanders played host to anti-Communist seminars on their bases and attended or addressed Right-wing meetings elsewhere."


Although no one in Congress could have known it at the time, Lemnitzer and the Joint Chiefs had quietly slipped over the edge.


According to secret and long-hidden documents obtained for Body of Secrets, the Joint Chiefs of Staff drew up and approved plans for what may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government. In the name of antiCommunism, they proposed launching a secret and bloody war of terrorism against their own country in order to trick the American public into supporting an ill-conceived war they intended to launch against Cuba.


Code named Operation Northwoods, the plan, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.


The idea may actually have originated with President Eisenhower in the last days of his administration. With the Cold War hotter than ever and the recent U-2 scandal fresh in the public's memory, the old general wanted to go out with a win. He wanted desperately to invade Cuba in the weeks leading up to Kennedy's inauguration; indeed, on January 3 he told Lemnitzer and other aides in his Cabinet Room that he would move against Castro before the inauguration if only the Cubans gave him a really good excuse. Then, with time growing short, Eisenhower floated an idea. If Castro failed to provide that excuse, perhaps, he said, the United States "could think of manufacturing something that would be generally acceptable." What he was suggesting was a pretext a bombing, an attack, an act of sabotage carried out secretly against the United States by the United States. Its purpose would be to justify the launching of a war. It was a dangerous suggestion by a desperate president.


Although no such war took place, the idea was not lost on General Lemnitzer But he and his colleagues were frustrated by Kennedy's failure to authorize their plan, and angry that Castro had not provided an excuse to invade.


The final straw may have come during a White House meeting on February 26, 1962. Concerned that General Lansdale's various covert action plans under Operation Mongoose were simply becoming more outrageous and going nowhere, Robert Kennedy told him to drop all anti-Castro efforts. Instead, Lansdale was ordered to concentrate for the next three months strictly on gathering intelligence about Cuba. It was a humiliating defeat for Lansdale, a man more accustomed to praise than to scorn.


As the Kennedy brothers appeared to suddenly "go soft" on Castro, Lemnitzer could see his opportunity to invade Cuba quickly slipping away. The attempts to provoke the Cuban public to revolt seemed dead and Castro, unfortunately, appeared to have no inclination to launch any attacks against Americans or their property Lemnitzer and the other Chiefs knew there was only one option left that would ensure their war. They would have to trick the American public and world opinion into hating Cuba so much that they would not only go along, but would insist that he and his generals launch their war against Castro. "World opinion, and the United Nations forum," said a secret JCS document, "should be favorably affected by developing the international image of the Cuban government as rash and irresponsible, and as an alarming and unpredictable threat to the peace of the Western Hemisphere."


Operation Northwoods called for a war in which many patriotic Americans and innocent Cubans would die senseless deaths, all to satisfy the egos of twisted generals back in Washington, safe in their taxpayer financed homes and limousines.


One idea seriously considered involved the launch of John Glenn, the first American to orbit the earth. On February 20,1962, Glenn was to lift off from Cape Canaveral, Florida, on his historic journey. The flight was to carry the banner of America's virtues of truth, freedom, and democracy into orbit high over the planet. But Lemnitzer and his Chiefs had a different idea. They proposed to Lansdale that, should the rocket explode and kill Glenn, "the objective is to provide irrevocable proof that . . . the fault lies with the Communists et al Cuba [sic.]"


This would be accomplished, Lemnitzer continued, "by manufacturing various pieces of evidence which would prove electronic interference on the part of the Cubans." Thus, as NASA prepared to send the first American into space, the Joint Chiefs of Staff were preparing to use John Glenn's possible death as a pretext to launch a war.


Glenn lifted into history without mishap, leaving Lemnitzer and the Chiefs to begin devising new plots which they suggested be carried out "within the time frame of the next few months."


Among the actions recommended was "a series of well coordinated incidents to take place in and around" the U.S. Navy base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. This included dressing "friendly" Cubans in Cuban military uniforms and then have them "start riots near the main gate of the base. Others would pretend to be saboteurs inside the base. Ammunition would be blown up, fires started, aircraft sabotaged, mortars fired at the base with damage to installations."


The suggested operations grew progressively more outrageous. Another called for an action similar to the infamous incident in February 1898 when an explosion aboard the battleship Maine in Havana harbor killed 266 U.S. sailors. Although the exact cause of the explosion remained undetermined, it sparked the Spanish-American War with Cuba. Incited by the deadly blast, more than one million men volunteered for duty. Lemnitzer and his generals came up with a similar plan. "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," they proposed; "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation."


There seemed no limit to their fanaticism: "We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington," they wrote. "The terror campaign could be pointed at Cuban refugees seeking haven in the United States.


We could sink a boatload of Cubans en route to Florida (real or simulated). . . . We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized."


Bombings were proposed, false arrests, hijackings:


*"Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government."


*"Advantage can be taken of the sensitivity of the Dominican [Republic] Air Force to intrusions within their national air space. 'Cuban' B-26 or C-46 type aircraft could make cane burning raids at night. Soviet Bloc incendiaries could be found. This could be coupled with 'Cuban' messages to the Communist underground in the Dominican Republic and 'Cuban' shipments of arms which would be found, or intercepted, on the beach. Use of MiG type aircraft by U.S. pilots could provide additional provocation."


*"Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft could appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the Government of Cuba."


Among the most elaborate schemes was to "create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight."


Lemnitzer and the Joint Chiefs worked out a complex deception:


An aircraft at Elgin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CJA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone [a remotely controlled unmanned aircraft]. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida.


From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Elgin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will be transmitting on the international distress frequency a "May Day" message stating he is under attack by Cuban MiG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft, which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO [International Civil Aviation Organization radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the U.S. what has happened to the aircraft instead of the U.S. trying to "sell" the incident.


Finally, there was a plan to "make it appear that Communist Cuban MiGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack." It was a particularly believable operation given the decade of shoot downs that had just taken place.


In the final sentence of his letter to Secretary McNamara recommending the operations, Lemnitzer made a grab for even more power asking that the Joint Chiefs be placed in charge of carrying out Operation Northwoods and the invasion. "It is recommended," he wrote, "that this responsibility for both oven and covert military operations be assigned to the Joint Chiefs of Staff."


At 2:30 on the afternoon of Tuesday, March 13, 1962, Lemnitzer went over last-minute details of Operation Northwoods with his covert action chief, Brigadier General William H. Craig, and signed the document. He then went to a "special meeting" in McNamara's office. An hour later he met with Kennedy's military representative, General Maxwell Taylor. What happened during those meetings is unknown. But three days later, President Kennedy told Lemnitzer that there was virtually no possibility that the U.S. would ever use overt military force in Cuba.


Undeterred, Lemnitzer and the Chiefs persisted, virtually to the point of demanding that they be given authority to invade and take over Cuba. About a month after submitting Operation Northwoods, they met the "tank," as the JCS conference room was called, and agreed on the wording of a tough memorandum to McNamara. "The Joint Chiefs of Staff believe that the Cuban problem must be solved in the near future," they wrote. "Further, they see no prospect of early success in overthrowing the present communist regime either as a result of internal uprising or external political, economic or psychological pressures. Accordingly they believe that military intervention by the United States will be required to overthrow the present communist regime."


Lemnitzer was virtually rabid in his hatred of Communism in general and Castro in particular "The Joint Chiefs of Staff believe that the United States can undertake military intervention in Cuba without risk of general war" he continued. "They also believe that the intervention can be accomplished rapidly enough to minimize communist opportunities for solicitation of UN action." However; what Lemnitzer was suggesting was not freeing the Cuban people, who were largely in support of Castro, but imprisoning them in a U.S. military-controlled police state. "Forces would assure rapid essential military control of Cuba," he wrote. "Continued police action would be required."


Concluding, Lemnitzer did not mince words: "[T]he Joint Chiefs of Staff recommend that a national policy of early military intervention in Cuba be adopted by the United States. They also recommend that such intervention be undertaken as soon as possible and preferably before the release of National Guard and Reserve forces presently on active duty."


By then McNamara had virtually no confidence in his military chief and was rejecting nearly every proposal the general sent to him. The rejections became so routine, said one of Lemnitzer's former staff officers, that the staffer told the general that the situation was putting the military in an "embarrassing rut." But Lemnitzer replied, "I am the senior military office--it's my job to state what I believe and it's his [McNamara's] job to approve or disapprove." "McNamara's arrogance was astonishing," said Lemnitzer's aide, who knew nothing of Operation Northwoods. "He gave General Lemnitzer very short shrift and treated him like a schoolboy. The general almost stood at attention when he came into the room. Everything was 'Yes, sir' and 'No, sir.'


Within months, Lemnitzer was denied a second term as JCS chairman and transferred to Europe as chief of NATO. Years later President Gerald Ford appointed Lemnitzer, a darling of the Republican right, to the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. Lemnitzer's Cuba chief, Brigadier General Craig, was also transferred. Promoted to major general, he spent three years as chief of the Army Security Agency, NSA's military arm.


Because of the secrecy and illegality of Operation Northwoods, all details remained hidden for forty years. Lemnitzer may have thought that all copies of the relevant documents had been destroyed; he was not one to leave compromising material lying around. Following the Bay of Pigs debacle, for example, he ordered Brigadier General David W Gray, Craig's predecessor as chief of the Cuba project within the JCS, to destroy all his notes concerning Joint Chiefs actions and discussions during that period. Gray's meticulous notes were the only detailed official records of what happened within the JCS during that time. According to Gray, Lemnitzer feared a congressional investigation and therefore wanted any incriminating evidence destroyed.


With the evidence destroyed, Lemnitzer felt free to lie to Congress. When asked, during secret hearings before a Senate committee, if he knew of any Pentagon plans for a direct invasion of Cuba he said he did not. Yet detailed JCS invasion plans had been drawn up even before Kennedy was inaugurated. And additional plans had been developed since. The consummate planner and man of details also became evasive, suddenly encountering great difficulty in recalling key aspects of the operation, as if he had been out of the country during the period. It was a sorry spectacle. Senator Gore called for Lemnitzer to be fired. "We need a shake up of the Joint Chiefs of Staff" he said. "We direly need a new chairman, as well as new members." No one had any idea of Operation Northwoods.


Because so many documents were destroyed, it is difficult to determine how many senior officials were aware of Operation Northwoods. As has been described, the document was signed and fully approved by Lemnitzer and the rest of the Joint Chiefs and addressed to the Secretary of Defense for his signature. Whether it went beyond McNamara to the president and the attorney general is not known.


Even after Lemnitzer lost his job, the Joint Chiefs kept planning "pretext" operations at least into 1963. Among their proposals was a deliberately create a war between Cuba and any of a number of .n American neighbors. This would give the United States military an excuse to come in on the side of Cuba's adversary and get rid of "A contrived 'Cuban' attack on an OAS [Organization of Americas] member could be set up," said one proposal, "and the attacked state could be urged to 'take measures of self-defense and request ice from the U.S. and OAS; the U.S. could almost certainly obtain necessary two-thirds support among OAS members for collective action against Cuba."


Among the nations they suggested that the United States secretly were Jamaica and Trinidad-Tobago. Both were members of the Commonwealth; thus, by secretly attacking them and then blaming Cuba, the United States could lure England into the war Castro. The report noted, "Any of the contrived situations de above are inherently, extremely risky in our democratic system in which security can be maintained, after the fact, with very great difficulty. If the decision should be made to set up a contrived situation it be one in which participation by U.S. personnel is limited only to the most highly trusted covert personnel. This suggests the infeasibility of the use of military units for any aspect of the contrived situation."


The report even suggested secretly paying someone in the Castro government to attack the United States: "The only area remaining for ration then would be to bribe one of Castro's subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on [the U.S. naval base at] Guantanamo." The act suggested--bribing a foreign nation to launch a violent attack American military installation--was treason.


In May 1963, Assistant Secretary of Defense Paul H. Nitze sent a the White House proposing "a possible scenario whereby an attack on a United States reconnaissance aircraft could be exploited toward the end of effecting the removal of the Castro regime." In the event Cuba attacked a U-2, the plan proposed sending in additional American pilots, this time on dangerous, unnecessary low-level reconnaissance missions with the expectation that they would also be shot down, thus provoking a war "[T]he U.S. could undertake various measures designed to stimulate the Cubans to provoke a new incident," said the plan. Nitze, however, did not volunteer to be one of the pilots.


One idea involved sending fighters across the island on "harassing reconnaissance" and "show-off" missions "flaunting our freedom of action, hoping to stir the Cuban military to action." "Thus," said the plan, "depending above all on whether the Cubans were or could be made to be trigger-happy, the development of the initial downing of a reconnaissance plane could lead at best to the elimination of Castro, perhaps to the removal of Soviet troops and the installation of ground inspection in Cuba, or at the least to our demonstration of firmness on reconnaissance." About a month later, a low-level flight was made across Cuba, but unfortunately for the Pentagon, instead of bullets it produced only a protest.


Lemnitzer was a dangerous-perhaps even unbalanced-right-wing extremist in an extraordinarily sensitive position during a critical period. But Operation Northwoods also had the support of every single member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and even senior Pentagon official Paul Nitze argued in favor of provoking a phony war with Cuba. The fact that the most senior members of all the services and the Pentagon could be so out of touch with reality and the meaning of democracy would be hidden for four decades.


In retrospect, the documents offer new insight into the thinking of the military's star-studded leadership. Although they never succeeded in launching America into a phony war with Cuba, they may have done so with Vietnam. More than 50,000 Americans and more than 2 million Vietnamese were eventually killed in that war.


It has long been suspected that the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident-the spark that led to America's long war in Vietnam-was largely staged or provoked by U.S. officials in order to build up congressional and public support for American involvement. Over the years, serious questions have been raised about the alleged attack by North Vietnamese patrol boats on two American destroyers in the Gulf But defenders of the Pentagon have always denied such charges, arguing that senior officials would never engage in such deceit.

Now, however, in light of the Operation Northwoods documents, it at deceiving the public and trumping up wars for Americans to fight and die in was standard, approved policy at the highest levels of the Pentagon. In fact, the Gulf of Tonkin seems right out of the Operation Northwoods playbook: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba . . . casualty lists in U.S. newspapers cause a helpful wave of indignation." One need only replace "Guantanamo Bay" with "Tonkin Gulf," and "Cuba" with "North Vietnam" and the Gulf of Tonkin incident may or may not have been stage-managed, but the senior Pentagon leadership at the time was clearly capable of such deceit.


Book epigram: "The public has a duty to watch its Government closely and keep it on the right track."
--Lieutenant Gen. Kenneth A. Minihan, USAF, Director, NSA, _NSA Newsletter_, June 1997


Tuesday, November 02, 2004

Coincidence Theorist's Guide to 9/11

Via http://RigorousIntuition.blogspot.com

I posted an earlier version of this last week at Democratic Underground http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2160541. I've added a number of more entries, and links for all.

Happy coincidenting!

That governments http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,1019246,00.html have permitted terrorist acts http://www.redvoltaire.net/article694.html against their own people http://avantgo.thetimes.co.uk/services/avantgo/article/0,,1150429,00.html, and have even themselves been perpetrators http://english.terror99.ru/explosions/ in order to find strategic advantage is quite likely true, but this is the United States we're talking about.

That intelligence agencies, financiers, terrorists and narco-criminals have a long history together is well established, but the Nugan Hand Bank http://sunday.ninemsn.com.au/sunday/investigative/case1.asp, BCCI http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1992_rpt/bcci/11intel.htm, Banco Ambrosiano http://www.deepblacklies.co.uk/operation_gladio.htm, the P2 Lodge http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Propaganda_Due, the CIA/Mafia http://www.jfklancer.com/cuba/castroplots.html anti-Castro/Kennedy alliance, Iran/Contra http://www.madcowprod.com/mc5012004.html and the rest were a long time ago, so there’s no need to rehash all that http://www.deepblacklies.co.uk/the_money_fountain.htm. That was then, this is now http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/KUP311A.html!

That Jonathan Bush’s Riggs Bank http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Riggs_Bank_N.A. has been found guilty of laundering terrorist funds and fined a US-record $25 million must embarrass his nephew George, but it's still no justification for leaping to paranoid conclusions.

That George Bush's brother Marvin sat on the board of the Kuwaiti-owned company which provided electronic security http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0204-06.htm to the World Trade Centre, Dulles Airport and United Airlines means nothing more than you must admit those Bush boys have done alright for themselves.

That George Bush found success as a businessman only after the investment of Osama’s brother Salem and reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mahfouz is just one of those things - one of those crazy http://www.americanfreepress.net/10_07_01/Bush___Bin_Laden_-_George_W__B/bush___bin_laden_-_george_w__b.html things.

That Osama bin Laden is known to have been an asset of US foreign policy in no way implies he still is http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/01-11-04/discussion.cgi.28.html.

That al Qaeda was active in the Balkan conflict, fighting on the same side as the US as recently as 1999, while the US protected http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/VIN204A.html its cells, is merely one of history's little aberrations http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MNA110A.html.

The claims of Michael Springman http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=104&row=1, State Department veteran of the Jeddah visa bureau, that the CIA ran the office and issued visas http://sandiego.indymedia.org/en/2002/02/521.shtml to al Qaeda members so they could receive training in the United States, sound like the sour grapes of someone who was fired for making such wild accusations.

That one of George Bush's first acts as President, in January 2001 http://www.complete911timeline.org/, was to end the two-year deployment of attack submarines which were positioned within striking distance of al Qaeda's Afghanistan camps, even as the group's guilt for the Cole bombing was established, proves that a transition from one administration to the next is never an easy task.

That so many influential figures http://www.newamericancentury.org/ in and close to the Bush White House http://www.crisispapers.org/Editorials/PNAC-Primer.htm had expressed, just a year before the attacks, the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" http://pilger.carlton.com/print/124759 before their militarist ambitions http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf could be fulfilled, demonstrates nothing more than the accidental virtue of being in the right place http://www.pnac.info/ at the right time.

That the company PTECH http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2002/021208-secure01.htm, founded by a Saudi financier placed on America’s Terrorist Watch List in October 2001, had access to the FAA’s entire computer system for two years before the 9/11 attack, means he must not have been such a threat after all.

That whistleblower Indira Singh http://www.madcowprod.com/mc4512004.html was told to keep her mouth shut and forget what she learned when she took her concerns about PTECH to her employers and federal authorities, suggests she lacked the big picture. And that the Chief Auditor for JP Morgan Chase told Singh repeatedly, as she answered questions about who supplied her with what information, that "that person should be killed," suggests he should take an anger management seminar.

That on May 8, 2001 , Dick Cheney took upon himself the job of co-ordinating a response to domestic terror attacks even as he was crafting the administration’s energy policy which bore implications http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article4458.htm for America's military, circumventing the established infrastructure and ignoring the recommendations of the Hart-Rudman report, merely shows the VP to be someone who finds it hard to delegate.

That the standing order which covered the shooting down http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/d302515_021897/d302515p.pdf of hijacked aircraft was altered on June 1, 2001, taking discretion away from field commanders and placing it solely in the hands of the Secretary of Defense, is simply poor planning and unfortunate timing. Fortunately the error has been corrected, as the order was rescinded shortly after 9/11.

That in the weeks before 9/11, FBI agent Colleen Rowley http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101020603/memo.html found her investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui so perversely thwarted http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MOO208B.html that her colleagues joked that bin Laden had a mole at the FBI, proves the stress-relieving virtue of humour in the workplace.

That Dave Frasca http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2003/02/43525.shtml of the FBI’s Radical Fundamentalist Unit received a promotion after quashing multiple, urgent requests for investigations into al Qaeda assets training at flight schools in the summer of 2001 does appear on the surface odd, but undoubtedly there's a good reason for it, quite possibly classified.

That FBI informant Randy Glass http://innworldreport.net/video/2004-07-02/glass.html, working an undercover sting, was told by Pakistani intelligence operatives that the World Trade Center towers were coming down, and that his repeated warnings http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/main/randyglass.html which continued until weeks before the attacks, including the mention of planes used as weapons, were ignored by federal authorities, is simply one of the many "What Ifs" of that tragic day.

That over the summer of 2001 Washington received many urgent, senior-level warnings http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1375723 from foreign intelligence agencies and governments - including those of Germany, France, Great Britain, Russia, Egypt, Israel, Morocco, Afghanistan and others - of impending terror attacks using hijacked aircraft and did nothing, demonstrates the pressing need for a new Intelligence Czar.

That John Ashcroft stopped flying commercial aircraft http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/07/26/national/main303601.shtml in July 2001 on account of security considerations had nothing to do with warnings regarding September 11, because he said so to the 9/11 Commission.

That former lead counsel for the House David Schippers http://infowars.com/transcript_schippers.html says he’d taken to John Ashcroft’s office specific warnings he’d learned from FBI agents in New York of an impending attack – even naming the proposed dates, names of the hijackers and the targets – and that the investigations had been stymied and the agents threatened, proves nothing but David Schipper’s pathetic need for attention.

That Garth Nicolson http://www.globalresearch.org/view_article.php?aid=670727528 received two warnings from contacts in the intelligence community and one from a North African head of state, which included specific site, date and source of the attacks, and passed the information to the Defense Department and the National Security Council to evidently no effect, clearly amounts to nothing, since virtually nobody has ever heard of him.

That in the months prior to September 11, self-described US intelligence operative Delmart Vreeland http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/index-vreeland.html sought, from a Toronto jail cell, to get US and Canadian authorities to heed his warning of his accidental discovery of impending catastrophic attacks is worthless, since Vreeland was a dubious character http://www.guerrillanews.com/wildcard/vreeland_one, notwithstanding the fact that many of his claims have since been proven true TheStar.ca.

That FBI Special Investigator Robert Wright http://www.judicialwatch.org/printer_2469.shtml claims that agents assigned to intelligence operations actually protect terrorists from investigation and prosecution, that the FBI shut down his probe into terrorist training camps, and that he was removed from a money-laundering case that had a direct link to terrorism, sounds like yet more sour grapes http://www.laweekly.com/ink/02/37/news-crogan.php from a disgruntled employee.

That George Bush had plans to invade Afghanistan on his desk before 9/11 http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-03-23-war-analysis_x.htm demonstrates only the value of being prepared http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/nov2001/afgh-n20.shtml.

The suggestion that securing a pipeline http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/oilwar1.html across Afghanistan figured into the White House’s calculations is as ludicrous as the assertion that oil played a part in determining war in Iraq.

That Afghanistan is once again the world’s principal heroin producer http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MCS306A.html is an unfortunate reality, but to claim the CIA is still actively involved http://www.lycaeum.org/drugwar/DARKALLIANCE/ciaheron.html in the narcotics trade is to presume bad faith http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO404A.html on the part of the agency.

Mahmood Ahmed http://www.billstclair.com/911timeline/main/mahmoodahmed.html, chief of Pakistan’s ISI, must not have authorized an al Qaeda payment of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta http://www1.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/articleshow?catkey=-2128936835&art_id=1454238160&sType=1 days before the attacks, and was not meeting with senior Washington officials over the week of 9/11, because I didn’t read anything about him in the official report.

That Porter Goss met with Ahmed http://www.melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2004/08/76366.php the morning of September 11 in his capacity as Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has no bearing whatsoever upon his recent selection by the White House to head the Central Intelligence Agency.

That Goss's congressional seat encompasses the 9/11 hijackers' Florida base http://portergoss.house.gov/ of operation, including their flight schools, is precisely the kind of meaningless factoid a conspiracy theorist would bring up.

It's true that George HW Bush and Dick Cheney spent the evening of September 10 alone in the Oval Office, but what's wrong with old colleagues catching up? And it's true that George HW Bush and Shafig bin Laden, Osama's brother, spent the morning of September 11 together http://observer.guardian.co.uk/magazine/story/0,11913,738196,00.html at a board meeting of the Carlyle Group, but the bin Ladens are a big family.

That FEMA arrived http://xymphora.blogspot.com/2004/07/fema-in-big-apple.html in New York on Sept 10 to prepare for a scheduled biowarfare drill, and had a triage centre ready to go that was larger and better equipped than the one that was lost in the collapse of WTC 7, was a lucky twist of fate.

Newsweek’s report http://www.disinfo.com/archive/pages/article/id2672/pg1/ that senior Pentagon officials cancelled flights on Sept 10 for the following day on account of security concerns is only newsworthy because of what happened the following morning.

That George Bush's telephone logs http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1819543 for September 11 do not exist should surprise no one, given the confusion of the day.

That Mohamed Atta attended http://www.911independentcommission.org/airports31804.html the International Officer's School at Maxwell Air Force Base, that Abdulaziz Alomari attended Brooks Air Force Base Aerospace Medical School, that Saeed Alghamdi attended the Defense Language Institute in Monterey merely shows it is a small world http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/jun2002/offi-j21.shtml, after all.

That Lt Col Steve Butler http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mcherald/3406502.htm, Vice Chancellor for student affairs of the Defense Language Institute during Alghamdi's terms, was disciplined http://www.truthout.org/docs_02/06.06E.butler.bush.htm, removed from his post and threatened with court martial when he wrote "Bush knew of the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism. What is... contemptible is the President of the United States not telling the American people what he knows for political gain," is the least that should have happened for such disrespect shown his Commander in Chief.

That Mohammed Atta http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1433886 dressed like a Mafioso, had a stripper girlfriend, smuggled drugs, was already a licensed pilot when he entered the US, enjoyed pork chops, drank to excess and did cocaine, was closer to Europeans than Arabs in Florida, and included the names of defence contractors on his email list, proves how dangerous the radical fundamentalist Muslim can be.

That 43 lbs of heroin was found on board the Lear Jet owned by Wally Hilliard http://newsmine.org/archive/9-11/questions/flightschool/hilliard-bankrolled-911-flight-school-and-rudi-dekkers.txt, the owner of Atta’s flight school, just three weeks after Atta enrolled – the biggest seizure ever in Central Florida – was just bad luck http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1294206. That Hilliard was not charged shows how specious the claims for conspiracy truly are.

That Hilliard’s plane http://www.madcowprod.com/books.html had made 30-round trips to Venezuela with the same passengers who always paid cash, that the plane had been supplied by a pair of drug smugglers who had also outfitted CIA drug runner Barry Seal http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ciadrugs/W_plane.html, and that 9/11 commissioner Richard ben-Veniste had been Seal’s attorney http://sanderhicks.com/benveniste.html before Seal’s murder http://www.wethepeople.la/seal2.htm, shows nothing but the lengths to which conspiracists will go to draw sinister conclusions http://www.voxfux.com/features/bush_crime_family.html.

Reports http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34910,00.html of insider trading http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x509119 on 9/11 are false, because the SEC http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2004-98.htm investigated and found only respectable investors who will remain nameless involved, and no terrorists, so the windfall profit-taking http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/12_06_01_death_profits_pt1.html was merely, as ever, coincidental.

That heightened security for the World Trade Centre was lifted immediately prior http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x10267 to the attacks illustrates that it always happens when you least expect it.

That Hani Hanjour, the pilot of Flight 77, was so incompetent http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=976740&mesg_id=976740 he could not fly a Cessna in August, but in September managed to fly a 767 at excessive speed into a spiraling, 270-degree descent and a level impact of the first floor of the Pentagon, on the only side that was virtually empty and had been hardened to withstand a terrorist attack, merely demonstrates that people can do almost anything once they set their minds to it.

That none http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/flightdata.html of the flight data recorders were said to be recoverable even though they were located in the tail sections, and that until 9/11, no solid-state recorder in a catastrophic crash had been unrecoverable, shows how there's a first time for everything.

That Mohammed Atta left a uniform, a will, a Koran, his driver's license and a "how to fly planes" http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/WTC_MAIN010912.html video in his rental car at the airport means he had other things on his mind.

The mention of Israelis with links to military-intelligence having been arrested http://abcnews.go.com/sections/2020/DailyNews/2020_whitevan_020621.html on Sept 11 videotaping and celebrating the attacks, of an Israeli espionage ring http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/05/07/students/index_np.html surveiling DEA and defense installations and trailing http://iraq-info.1accesshost.com/schrom.html the hijackers, and of a warning of impending attacks delivered to the Israeli company Odigo two hours before the first plane hit, does not deserve a response.

That the stories also appeared in publications such as Ha'aretz and Forward http://www.forward.com/issues/2002/02.03.15/news2.html is a sad display of self-hatred among certain elements of the Israeli media.

That multiple military wargames and simulations were underway the morning of 9/11 – one simulating the crash of a plane http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1298401 into a building; another, a live-fly simulation of multiple hijackings http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1694495 – and took many interceptors away from the eastern seaboard and confused field commanders as to which was a real hijacked aircraft and which was a hoax, was a bizarre coincidence, but no less a coincidence.

That the National Military Command Center ops director asked a rookie substitute http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x631352 to stand his watch at 8:30 am on Sept. 11 is nothing more than bad timing.

That a recording http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=535331&mesg_id=535331 made Sept 11 of air traffic controllers’ describing what they had witnessed, was destroyed by an FAA official who crushed it in his hand, cut the tape into little pieces and dropped them in different trash cans around the building, is something no doubt that overzealous official wishes he could undo.

That the FBI knew precisely which http://www.observer.com/pages/story.asp?ID=7816 Florida flight schools to descend upon hours after the attacks should make every American feel safer knowing their federal agents are on the ball.

That a former flight school executive http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1433886 believes the hijackers were "double agents," and says about Atta and associates, "Early on I gleaned that these guys had government protection. They were let into this country for a specific purpose," and was visited by the FBI just four hours after the attacks to intimidate him into silence, proves he's an unreliable witness, for the simple reason there is no conspiracy.

That Jeb Bush was on board http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1328855 an aircraft that removed flight school records to Washington in the middle of the night on Sept 12th demonstrates how seriously the governor takes the issue of national security.

To insinuate evil motive from the mercy flights of bin Laden family members and Saudi royals after 9/11 shows the sickness of the conspiratorial mindset.

Le Figaro’s report http://www.guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html in October 2001, known to have originated with French intelligence, that the CIA met Osama bin Laden in a Dubai hospital in July 2001, proves again the perfidy of the French.

That the tape DemocraticUnderground.com in which bin Laden claims responsibility for the attacks was released by the State Department after having been found providentially by US forces in Afghanistan, and depicts a fattened Osama with a broader face and a flatter nose, proves Osama, and Osama alone, masterminded 9/11.

That at the battle of Tora Bora, where bin Laden was surrounded on three sides, Special Forces received no order to advance and capture him and were forced to stand and watch as two Russian-made helicopters http://www.fayettevillenc.com/story-archive.php?Template=terrorism&Story=37935 flew into the area where bin Laden was believed hiding, loaded up passengers and returned to Pakistan, demonstrates how confusing the modern battlefield can be.

That upon returning to Fort Bragg from Tora Bora, the same Special Operations troops who had been stood down from capturing bin Laden, suffered a unusual spree of murder/suicides http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=1536576, is nothing more than a series of senseless tragedies.

Reports that bin Laden is currently receiving periodic dialysis treatment http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-789042,curpg-1.cms in a Pakistani medical hospital are simply too incredible to be true.

That the White House went on Cipro September 11 http://www.judicialwatch.org/2953.shtml shows the foresightedness of America’s emergency response.

That the anthrax was mailed to perceived liberal media and the Democratic leadership http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/jan2002/anth-j23.shtml demonstrates only the perversity of the terrorist psyche.

That the anthrax attacks http://www.oilempire.us/anthrax.html appeared to silence opponents of the Patriot Act http://www.freefromterror.net/other_articles/gov_anthrax.html shows only that appearances can be deceiving.

That the Ames-strain anthrax was found to have originated at Fort Detrick http://www.glennbeck.com/news/03202002.shtml, and was beyond the capability of all but a few labs to refine, underscores the importance of allowing the investigation to continue without the distraction of absurd conspiracy theories http://www.counterpunch.org/madsenanthrax.html.

That Republican guru Grover Norquist has been found to have aided financiers http://www.citizensoldier.org/norquist.html and supporters of Islamic terror to gain access to the Bush White House, and is a founder of the Islamic Institute, which the Treasury Department believes to be a source of funding for al Qaeda, suggests Norquist is at worst, naive, and at best, needs a wider circle of friends.

That the Department of Justice consistently chooses to see accused 9/11 plotters go free rather than permit the courtroom testimony of al Qaeda leaders http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0206-04.htm in American custody looks bad, but only because we don't have all the facts.

That the White House balked http://edition.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/inv.terror.probe/ at any inquiry into the events of 9/11, then starved it of funds http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,437267,00.html and stonewalled http://home.earthlink.net/~imfalse/9-11_commission_says.html it, was unfortunate, but since the commission didn't find for conspiracy it's all a non issue anyway.

That the 9/11 commission's executive director and "gatekeeper," Philip Zelikow, was so closely involved in the events under investigation that he testified http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20040115-024012-7011r before the the commission as part of the inquiry, shows only an apparent conflict of interest.

That commission chair Thomas Kean is, like George Bush, a Texas oil executive who had business dealings with reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mafouz http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Thomas_H._Kean, suggests Texas is smaller than they say it is.

That co-chair Lee Hamilton has a history as a Bush family "fixer," including clearing Bush Sr of the claims arising from the 1980 "October Surprise" http://www.btinternet.com/~nlpwessex/Documents/hamiltonoctsurprise.htm, is of no concern, since only conspiracists believe there was such a thing http://www.consortiumnews.com/archive/xfile.html as an October Surprise.

That FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds accuses the agency of intentionally fudging specific pre-9/11 warnings and harboring a foreign espionage ring in its translation department DemocraticUnderground.com, and claims she witnessed evidence of the semi-official DemocraticUnderground.com infrastructure of money-laundering DemocraticUnderground.com and narcotics trade DemocraticUnderground.com behind the attacks, is of no account, since John Ashcroft has gagged her with the rare invocation of "State Secrets Privilege," and retroactively classified her public testimony. For the sake of national security, let us speak no more of her.

That, when commenting on Edmond's case, Daniel Ellsberg http://www.breakfornews.com/Sibel-Edmonds1.htm remarked that Ashcroft could go to prison for his part in a cover-up, suggests Ellsberg is giving comfort to the terrorists, and could, if he doesn't wise up, find himself declared an enemy combatant http://www.claremont.org/projects/jurisprudence/hamdi_ussc.html.

I could go on. And on and on. But I trust you get the point. Which is simply this: there are no secrets, an American government would never accept civilian casualties for geostrategic gain, and conspiracies are for the weak-minded and gullible. posted by Jeff at 5:15 PM

http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2004/08/coincidence-theorists-guide-to-911.html

http://www.blogger.com/app/post.pyra?blogID=7966076&postID=109260819515580578&quickEdit=true

http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2004/08/coincidence-theorists-guide-to-911.html

Monday, November 01, 2004

911 Anomalies and Counting

There are at least nine hundred and eleven anomalies related to the official story of what happened September 11th, 2001. There may even be THOUSANDS of anomalies. This blog will document them all.